Choosing Fabrics for Scrub Uniforms
- Pitsinee Pannasuriyaporn
- Sep 11
- 2 min read
Scrub uniforms are widely used in hospitals, clinics, and medical institutions. Beyond a professional appearance, the key factors are comfort, durability, and suitability for work conditions. Therefore, choosing the right fabric for scrubs is an important decision that should not be overlooked.

Common Fabrics Used in Scrub Production
1. Polyester-Cotton Blend (TC: Tetoron Cotton)
One of the most popular choices for scrubs.
Lightweight, durable, and affordable.
Offers moderate breathability.
Withstands frequent washing—ideal for hospital use.
2. Polyester-Rayon Blend (TR: Tetoron Rayon)
Softer and smoother than TC blends.
Comfortable and gentle on the skin.
Provides a more premium, elegant look.
Suitable for scrubs that require both comfort and style.
3. Stretch Blends (Polyester + Spandex or Cotton + Spandex)
High elasticity for ease of movement.
Perfect for doctors, nurses, or dentists who are constantly active.
Retains shape well but generally higher in cost.
4. Microfiber Blends
Soft texture, lightweight, and breathable.
Quick-drying and easy to care for.
Suitable for hot and humid climates, or for long working hours.
5. 100% Cotton
Naturally breathable and comfortable—great for sensitive skin.
May shrink or wrinkle more easily compared to blends.
Often used in premium scrubs that prioritize maximum comfort.
Factors to Consider When Choosing Fabrics
Comfort – Gentle on the skin and not too warm.
Durability – Withstands frequent washing without fading or losing shape.
Easy Care – Quick-drying, wrinkle-resistant, and easy to iron.
Professional Appearance – Creates a neat, reliable image for medical staff.

The right scrub uniform requires fabrics that balance comfort, durability, and professional appearance. Options such as TC, TR, Spandex blends, Microfiber, or 100% Cotton each have their own advantages. An experienced manufacturer can recommend the most suitable fabric to ensure scrubs that are comfortable, long-lasting, and cost-effective.
Comments